BBCĮverton fans will rightly be angry about the three-match ban for their player, as a yellow card is the best outcome in both cases. Kieran Trippier caught Kevin De Bruyne on the shin rather than on the knee with his studs. In fact, many people will think that Trippier going into the challenge with both feet off the floor must mean he was out of control and the red card should have stood. That raises grounds for a pitchside review, though the VAR still has the right to uphold the red card based upon the nature of the challenge. Gillett, who was on the blind side to the tackle, believed there had been studs-on-knee contact by Trippier, but the replays showed that wasn't the case and the foul was the top of the Newcastle defender's boot onto the bottom of De Bruyne's shin. The first stage of a VAR review is for the referee to describe what he has seen, and the VAR then checks that against the replays. VAR Peter Bankes advised a review to downgrade Kieran Trippier's red card to a yellow. A challenge can be subjectively correct as a yellow card but also not subjectively incorrect as a red card - which is why the appeal failed. Everton's anger was compounded when their appeal against the midfielder's three-match ban was rejected by a Football Association panel.
ALL CITY NATURE CROSS WEIGHT UPGRADE
The intervention to upgrade Allan's card to red was unnecessary, as the referee's original decision of a yellow card was a justifiable disciplinary outcome and wasn't a clear and obvious error. It's why two very similar situations can result in opposite outcomes. This will always rely on an individual referee's interpretation just as supporters will disagree about the nature of some challenges, so will officials. Ultimate consistency isn't possible with VAR, because whether a review goes to the monitor will come down to the subjective view of the video referee. It comes down to whether a referee judges the challenge to be serious foul play, and in particular if the offending player has endangered the safety of an opponent with excessive force or brutality. Allan was sent off via a VAR review for a tackle on Allan Saint-Maximin in March. The key difference between the challenges is the way Allan leads with his studs showing, which is always viewed more seriously. It does present a comparison with a similar VAR situation involving Newcastle last season, when the opposite happened as referee Craig Pawson booked Everton's Allan for a challenge on Allan Saint-Maximin and the VAR (Stuart Attwell) advised he should be sent off. VAR review: This decision might split some supporters, because there's no doubt the Trippier challenge was cynical and calculated, but a yellow card feels like the correct decision. Kieran Trippier was initially sent off by referee Jarred Gillett.
VAR decision: The VAR, Peter Bankes, advised the card be downgraded to yellow. Referee Jarred Gillett showed the red card. What happened: With the score 3-3, Manchester City midfielder Kevin De Bruyne broke forward across the halfway line and was brought down by Newcastle United defender Kieran Trippier. Overturned red card: Trippier foul on De Bruyne VAR in the Premier League: Ultimate guide VAR's wildest moments: Alisson's two red cards in one game How VAR decisions affected every Prem club in 2022-23
Video Assistant Referee (VAR) causes controversy every week in the Premier League, but how are decisions made, and are they correct?Īfter each weekend, we take a look at the most high-profile incidents and examine the process both in terms of VAR protocol and the Laws of the Game.
0 kommentar(er)
